Tag Archive for: radiation

Posts

Why You Should Get Rid of Your Microwave!

Microwaves – probably one of the most celebrated and widely used 20th century inventions in the western world. The chances are, even if you don’t use it, you’ll have one in your house and office. They’re quick and convenient, but they pose all sorts of health risks, and are best avoided at all costs. But just what is it that’s so bad about them?

They’re radioactive, and mess with your heart rate and blood cells

On average, microwaves produce 2.4 GHz radiation, which can have serious impacts on your body. A study by Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University has shown that this amount of radiation can cause ‘immediate and drastic’ changes to your heart rate. Another study by Dr. Hans Hertel shows that this radiation alters the balance of red and white blood cells. Research also indicates that microwave radiation can lead to blood sugar spikes connected with diabetes in susceptible individuals.

They zap nutrients right out of your food

Due to the dielectric heating of foods when cooked in a microwave, a startling amount of the nutrients are lost in the ‘cooking’ process. Studies have shown an approximate 40% drop in the levels of vitamin B12 in meat when heated in a microwave as opposed to traditional methods. Even more shockingly, broccoli was found to lose up to 97% of its antioxidants when microwaved, as opposed to just 11% when steamed. As the Paleo diet focuses on eating clean, nutrient dense foods, microwaving doesn't make much sense does it?

They transfer carcinogens into food

If you reheat your food in any kind of plastic wrap, or even in a plastic tub, all sorts of chemicals can leak into your meal. In a study by the Russian government, levels of BPA, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), benzene, toluene, and xylene were discovered in microwaved food.

And it’s not just the food itself you need to worry about..

Perhaps most shockingly of all, as microwaves are supposedly ‘safe’ to use in the home – they can leak radiation and electromagnetic emissions directly into your kitchen. You wouldn’t eat your food in an electromagnetic power plant, so why put yourself in the same danger in your kitchen?

Our hectic lives mean that sometimes we just don’t have the time to prepare healthy, delicious meals for the whole family every evening. Sometimes, meal planning and cooking food in large batches is one of the best ways of saving time whilst ensuring everyone eats healthily. But what if you want to reheat that food? Personally, when I’m batch cooking, I tend to mainly make stews, curries, casseroles, even soups. These are really easy to reheat using a traditional saucepan and stove, and can be ready in minutes. Also, I tend to peel and chop my veggies when I have the time so they are ready to roast, boil or steam when I want them. I’ll often roast up some sweet potatoes or squash in their skin – and when I want to eat them, I’ll just throw them in a hot oven for five minutes to heat through before peeling. When it comes to meat, I’ll often chop this up and leave it in the fridge ready to cook. Stir fries are a brilliant way to quickly cook your protein, especially if you dice it finely. Steak, Lamb, Salmon and Tuna are also excellent choices if you’re in a rush, as they can (and should!) be eaten rare, so will only take a couple of minutes to cook each side.

Why Ditching the Microwave Supports a More Intentional Way of Eating

One of the fundamental principles of the Paleo lifestyle is mindfulness — taking time to understand what you’re putting into your body and how it’s prepared. Microwaving doesn’t exactly align with that. It’s often synonymous with rushed eating, packaged meals, and convenience at the expense of quality. While it may shave a few minutes off meal prep, it robs you of connection with your food — a connection that’s essential to long-term health and wellbeing.

When you remove the microwave from your routine, you naturally begin to plan and prepare your meals with more intention. You’re more likely to make real food choices and less likely to rely on processed or packaged meals. Over time, this shift alone can transform not only your health but also your relationship with food and how you experience meals.

Simple and Speedy Reheating Alternatives

If the idea of giving up your microwave sounds impractical, consider how easy it actually is to reheat food using safer, more Paleo-aligned methods:

Stovetop: For soups, stews, curries, or casseroles, simply warm over medium heat in a saucepan with a splash of water or broth to prevent sticking. Most meals are ready to eat within 5–7 minutes.
Oven: For roasted vegetables, leftover meats, or baked dishes, preheat your oven to 160°C (320°F), cover with foil, and heat for around 10–15 minutes. The result? Even heating and a much better texture than a microwave can offer.
Steam Basket: A brilliant option for reheating vegetables while maintaining their nutrients. It only takes a few minutes and adds a gentle warmth without compromising taste or texture.
Slow Cooker: If you’re feeding a family, this is ideal for heating large portions slowly and evenly. Just set it on low while you’re at work or out running errands, and return to a warm, ready-to-eat meal.

Time-Saving Tips Without the Microwave

Many people rely on microwaves due to the belief that they simply don’t have time. But with a little bit of forethought, you can reheat food just as quickly — and much more safely — using traditional methods. Here’s how:

Invest in quality cookware: A cast-iron skillet, enamelled pot, or good quality stainless steel pan can help reheat food evenly and quickly on the stove.
Reheat while you multitask: Put your leftovers in a saucepan or oven first, then pack lunches, prep your breakfast, or clean up while it heats through. You’ll barely notice the time.
Use the oven's residual heat: If you’ve cooked dinner in the oven, switch it off when you’re done and slide in a container of tomorrow’s lunch. It’ll warm gently without needing extra energy or time in the morning.

Enhancing Flavour Through Traditional Reheating

Another benefit of avoiding the microwave is the boost in flavour. Have you ever noticed how microwaved food can taste bland or rubbery? That’s because microwaves heat unevenly, drying out some parts while leaving others cold. By reheating food on the stove or in the oven, you preserve moisture, deepen flavours, and maintain a satisfying texture. Stews become richer, casseroles thicken, and meats retain their juiciness.

How Microwaving Affects Your Containers

It’s not just your food that suffers in the microwave — your containers do too. Reheating food in plastic containers, even those labelled “microwave safe,” can release a range of harmful chemicals such as phthalates, dioxins, and BPA into your food. These endocrine-disrupting compounds have been linked to a number of health issues, including hormonal imbalances and fertility problems. Opting for glass or ceramic containers, and heating your food outside of the microwave, dramatically reduces this risk.

Retraining Your Routine for Better Health

Adopting a microwave-free kitchen might feel like a major adjustment at first, especially if you're used to relying on it. But after a few weeks, it becomes second nature. The slight increase in prep time is easily outweighed by the benefits in food quality, nutrient retention, and peace of mind. It’s all about rethinking the way we approach convenience and prioritising practices that align with long-term wellness.

Start with small changes — perhaps by setting aside the microwave for one meal a day. Then, experiment with stove or oven reheating for your favourite leftovers. Before long, you’ll discover that the microwave isn’t quite as essential as you once believed.

Final Thoughts on Ditching the Microwave

The Paleo lifestyle is about stripping things back to what works best for your body and honouring the natural way of living. Microwaves may be modern marvels of convenience, but they fall short when it comes to nutrient preservation, food safety, and overall health. With simple adjustments and a touch of planning, you can enjoy tastier meals, retain more nutrients, and avoid the potential health risks associated with microwave use — all while staying true to a more mindful, ancestral approach to eating.

If you’ve already said goodbye to your microwave, what’s been the biggest benefit you’ve noticed? If you’re thinking about it, what’s holding you back? Let me know in the comments — I’d love to hear your thoughts!

What are your thoughts on microwaving food? Is it something you still do or did you give it up along with the grains and sugar?

What Has Fukushima Got To Do With You?

I'm sure you’re aware of the Fukushima disaster that hit Japan in 2011 – but you might be wondering what it has to do with you?

Following a big earthquake, a tsunami followed, which destroyed the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power plant. This result in almost unimaginable levels of radiation. Whilst a clean up operation is underway, with the levels of radiation, the clean up effort is a drop in the ocean. Several deaths have already occurred due to the radiation that came from the disaster.

What exactly has radiation from the Fukushima disaster done to the food chain, especially fish? Is what you are eating healthy?

Scientists have been tracking the effect of the radiation in fish since the disaster. Radiation has been discovered in fish as far away as California.

What are the risks of eating fish with traces of radiation?

Unfortunately this is not an easy question to answer. Nuclear power and environmental health expert Rosalie Bertell said “Should the public discover the true health costs of nuclear pollution, a cry would rise from all parts of the world, and people would refuse to cooperate passively with their own death”. She also said “Claiming nuclear production of energy is ‘clean’ is like dieting, but stuffing yourself with food between meals”.

One of the problems with quantifying the dangers of radiation like this, is that the half life is so long, the damage will be done for years and years to come. It’s hard to predict today, how much damage the disaster will cause over the next few generations.

How Can You Stay Safe?

It’s really important to know exactly where your food comes from. So much frozen fish is imported from overseas – and unfortunately with the labelling laws in some countries, it can be very difficult to identify which country the fish comes from. Try to buy your fish local – and wild caught if at all possible. When buying seaweeds, make sure you know where they came from. Maine is supposed to be a good place to source seaweed from.

The Broader Impact of Fukushima on the Global Food Supply

Although Fukushima may seem like a distant issue confined to Japan’s shores, the reality is that our food system is more interconnected than ever. Thanks to global shipping and trade agreements, food grown or caught in one corner of the world can easily make its way onto a plate on the other side of the planet. This is especially true for seafood, where origin tracking is often murky and supply chains are complex.

In the years following the Fukushima disaster, radiation monitoring of seafood became a priority in several countries. However, the frequency and scope of testing vary significantly depending on national regulations, consumer demand, and political will. This means there’s no guarantee that every batch of imported seafood has been adequately screened for radioactive contamination.

Bioaccumulation and the Marine Food Chain

One of the key concerns with radiation in the marine environment is bioaccumulation. This is the process by which toxins — including radioactive isotopes like Cesium-137 — accumulate in organisms over time. Small fish absorb the radiation from the water or their food, and as larger predators eat many smaller fish, the radiation compounds up the food chain.

This means that apex predators like tuna, swordfish, and certain species of shark may carry higher levels of contamination than smaller, shorter-lived species. These are the same fish most often consumed in sushi restaurants and high-end seafood dishes. The long half-lives of radioactive elements mean they can persist in ocean ecosystems for decades, making their way into commercial seafood years after the initial incident.

Is the Radiation Risk Exaggerated?

There is a considerable divide between mainstream regulatory assessments and the concerns raised by independent scientists and environmental health advocates. Official statements often claim that radiation levels in fish remain within “safe” limits. However, critics argue that these safety thresholds are not based on cumulative lifetime exposure or the synergistic effects of multiple contaminants — nor do they account for the vulnerability of children, pregnant women, or those with compromised immune systems.

There’s also the issue of dilution. While radiation may be more diffuse in distant parts of the Pacific, the radioactive particles are still present and can enter marine life in small but biologically relevant amounts. Even low levels of exposure may increase the risk of cancer and genetic damage over time, especially when exposure is chronic or coupled with other environmental toxins.

What You Can Do to Reduce Exposure

While you can’t control what happens in the ocean, you can make conscious decisions about what ends up in your shopping trolley. Here are a few practical tips to help reduce the risk of radiation exposure through seafood and marine-based products:

Buy local seafood whenever possible, ideally from sources you trust. In Australia, that might mean selecting wild-caught barramundi, snapper, or flathead from local fisheries rather than imported fish with unclear origins.
Avoid large, long-living ocean predators such as tuna, marlin, and swordfish. These species tend to accumulate the most toxins, including mercury and radioactive elements.
Seek out transparency from suppliers. Some premium seafood brands provide detailed traceability, including where and how their fish were caught. If that information is not available, consider it a red flag.
Limit consumption of imported dried seaweed, kelp, and other marine plants unless you know the region of origin. As noted earlier, the coast of Maine in the USA is currently regarded as one of the safer regions for seaweed harvesting.
Choose smaller fish lower on the food chain, such as sardines, anchovies, or mackerel. These are generally less contaminated and also offer high levels of omega-3 fatty acids.

Labelling Laws and the Need for Change

One of the most frustrating aspects of this issue is the lack of mandatory, accurate country-of-origin labelling on seafood in many places. While Australia has relatively strong labelling requirements in supermarkets, it’s still legal for restaurants and food service outlets to serve imported seafood without disclosing its source. This lack of transparency makes it incredibly difficult for consumers to make informed decisions.

There’s growing pressure from consumer advocacy groups to tighten food labelling laws and implement more rigorous screening procedures for radioactive contamination, especially in imported goods. Supporting these initiatives can help drive change from the ground up — so be sure to speak up, ask questions, and vote with your wallet wherever possible.

The Bigger Picture: Fukushima as a Wake-Up Call

The Fukushima disaster is not just a Japanese problem. It’s a stark reminder of how fragile our modern systems are — from nuclear energy to globalised food production. It also exposes the limits of government transparency, as many official reports were initially downplayed or delayed.

For those of us striving to live a more natural, intentional lifestyle — whether through Paleo, ancestral, or real-food principles — the event reinforces the importance of self-education and responsibility. When it comes to what we eat, blind trust in the system is no longer a viable strategy.

Should You Stop Eating Seafood Altogether?

Not necessarily. Seafood is an incredibly nutrient-dense food source, rich in omega-3s, iodine, selenium, and quality protein. Rather than eliminating it entirely, the key is to be selective and mindful about sourcing. If you can access local, sustainably caught fish from clean waters, there is no reason to avoid it.

However, now more than ever, it’s vital to avoid low-quality seafood from industrial sources. Fish farming practices in some countries raise additional concerns around antibiotics, overcrowding, and feed contamination — issues that compound potential radiation risks.

Final Thoughts: A New Awareness Around Sourcing

The Fukushima disaster highlights how interconnected we are with the planet — and how the consequences of environmental events can ripple across oceans and generations. While the full impact of the incident may not be known for decades, we don’t have to wait to take action. By choosing local, transparent, and responsibly sourced seafood, you can protect your health and contribute to a more sustainable food system.

In the end, the best defence is knowledge. Ask questions. Read labels. Support producers who care about transparency and food safety. And, above all, prioritise real, whole food — the kind our ancestors ate long before industrial disasters entered the picture.

Are you concerned about where your food comes from? How do you avoid eating potentially harmful food like this? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this, and on the Fukushima disaster, in the comments below.